Mar 13

In the previous post, we looked at two bookstores run by Phil and Turner. These characters were running their stores based on two different purchasing philosophies. At the end of the year, they both ended with the same gross profit.

However, Turner had some distinct advantages.

  1. He had more  titles (breadth of selection)
  2. He ordered more often, and could meet changes in demand more quickly
  3. More selection led to higher dollars per sale at the register
  4. Fewer units per title meant less overstock and fewer returns
  5. Faster turns meant faster cash flow, and cash is king

But wait a minute, what happened to the old adage, ‘stack-em-high and watch-em-fly?’ Certainly discount is more important on hot best selling items…right?

Let’s look at a hypothetical best-seller called Laugh Out Loud (LOL). The retail price is $20.00. The publisher is promoting the book heavily, and is offering the bookstore 52% for an advance order of 150 units. The book is successful, just like the sales rep said, and the inventory sells out in six months.

Phil loves discount and he jumps at the deal.

His sales are $3,000 (150*$20)

His cost of sales is $1,440 ($20*.48*150)

His gross profit is $1,560 ($3,000-$1,440)

Phil’s average inventory investment is 75 books for six months (150/2) at a cost of $720 ($20*.48*75). Average inventory investment means the cash is gone. It can’t be used for anything else.

Phil’s inventory turn is four times/year (150 book sold in half a year).

Phil’s ROI is $1.08 for every dollar invested in inventory on the best-seller. (gross profit/cost of sales) or ($1,560/$1,440)

Phil’s annualized return is four times the ROI (4 turns/year) or $4.32 for every $1.00. Phil earned $4.32 for each dollar he invested in the LOL promotion

Turner, being a different sort, says no to the discount and buys 25 units from his wholesaler at 40% discount. He continues to order 15 units every time the inventory falls to 10 units on the shelf.

His sales are $3,000 (150*$20)

His cost of sales is $1,800 ($20*.6*150)

His gross profit is $1,200 ($3,000-$1,800)

Turner’s average inventory investment is 18 books ((25+10)/2) or $216 (18 units*($20*.6)

Phil’s ROI is $.67 for every dollar invested in inventory on the best-seller. (gross profit/cost of sales) or ($1,200/$1,800). This is considerably less than Phil’s ROI! Not only is the ROI less, but the gross profit is $240 less too!

 

Now the rest of the story.

Because Turner operated on a Just-in-Time (JIT) inventory philosophy, his inventory turn is 16.68 times/year (150 book sold in half a year divided by average inventory of 18*2 to annualize). Because of these turns, Turner’s annualized jumps to an astounding $11.34 for every $1.00. Turner earned $11.34 for each dollar he invested in the LOL promotion!

Turner was also able to use the available cash on hand due to less inventory investment ($216 vs. $720), which was more than $500 more than Phil had to work with, to buy other titles. If Turner invests this $504 at the same rate of return, he will generate nearly $3,000 MORE in gross profit during the same six month period than Phil will earn, from the same inventory investment.

Even if Turner’s additional titles only turn twice on each dollar invested, instead of the eleven turns he sees with LOL, he will generate another $334 of gross profit during the six month period, easily wiping out the perceived discount advantage that Phil thought he had

As with retail, the publisher has to consider this same math when deciding on a print model. The old ways of ‘stack-em-high and watch-em-fly’ don’t work for the publisher either. The new model utilizes short run printing and true print-on-demand options. Retailers are maybe less important for some publishers, but engaging sales through direct-to-consumer tools are becoming more important. How does this sort of math help a publisher be more nimble? Profitable?

Something to consider.

Tagged with:
Mar 08

I found this post to be challenging, mainly because the process of analyzing numbers is quite a ways down the list of things that I love doing. Don’t get me wrong, I love looking at top line business numbers, especially as they relate to sales growth. But margin analysis can quickly make my eyes cross, even in the midst of being a key to business growth. However, this information is key for booksellers and I had help making is as simple as possible.

During my stint as head of sales for a major book distributor, our CEO took our leadership team through what turned out to be a crash course on the mathematics of bookselling, which we found out later, he had adapted from a monograph by Leonard Shatzkin with the same name. By asking a simple question, he helped us understand bookselling better than most people in the industry. Buckle up. I am going to share my notes from this session in two posts.

What is more important in determining financial success? Gross margin percentage or inventory turns?

Let’s look at two bookstores run by Phil and Turner. Each has $100,000 to invest in inventory.

Phil purchases his inventory from publishers at publisher discounts – we will assume 50% for this exercise. Phil has to carry more units per title to make sure he doesn’t run out when the publisher takes a week or two to fill the order, and to make sure he can meet the minimum order requirements from the publisher. Phil is happy when he achieves four inventory turns per year.

Turner is a bit of a rebel, and decides to forgo the extra discount and orders his product from a wholesaler at 40%. Turner orders a lot more often because the order processing time is much quicker with the wholesaler – his orders ship the same day he orders. The other important benefit the wholesaler offers Turner is that all of his publishers can be added to the same box and shipped together. This allows Turner to stock more titles, even though he is carrying less of each title on the shelf. As a result, Turner achieves six turns per year.

Here is where we break out the math.

Assume that Phil and Turner both sell their books at full retail, and assume their costs (rent, financing, etc.) are the same. Which is better off financially? Let’s take a look.

Phil gets 50% discount.

Annual purchases are $400,000 ($100,000 x 4)

Inventory sold four times at retail equals $800,000 ($400,000/.5)

Sales = $800,000

Cost of Sales = $400,000

Gross Profit = $400,000 ($800,000-$400,000) or 50%

 

Turner gets 40% discount.

Annual purchases are $600,000 ($100,000 x 6)

Inventory sold six times at retail equals $1,000,000 ($600,000/.6)

Sales = $1,000,000

Cost of Sales = $600,000

Gross Profit = $400,000 ($1,000,000-$400,000) or 40

In this exercise, they are equal. They both end up with the same gross profit. Does this surprise you? It surprised me. I assumed that more discount meant more gross profit. This same inventory turn concept applies to publishers who work with short run printing. The more turns, the better the cash flow, even with less ‘margin’ on a book. Reducing risk, by printing less (especially true print on demand) is not only profitable, but the way of the future.

In the next exercise, we will see some interesting things happen with the numbers that our two retailers are experiencing.

%

 

Tagged with:
preload preload preload